Showing posts with label search engine optimization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label search engine optimization. Show all posts

Feb 9, 2011

SEO vs. the paywall

Farhad Manjoo at Slate wonders if the AOL-Huffington Post deal could falter as SEO loses its mojo inside Google's search algorithms. HuffPo can attribute much of its success to cutting down big stories into digestable sizes and then search engine optimizing the hell out of them. To explain how it works, Manjoo offered the following summary of the AOL deal to buy HuffPo:
Before I go on, let me stop and say a couple of more important things: Aol, Aol Acquires Huffington Post, Aol Buys Huffington Post, Aol Buys Huffpo, Aol Huffington Post, Huffington Post, Huffington Post Aol, Huffington Post Aol Merger, Huffington Post Media Group, Huffington Post Sold, Huffpo Aol, Huffpost Aol, Media News.
 Meantime, Felix Salmon says AOL-HuffPo will eventually beat the New York Times and compares the former site to walking through Times Square while the New York Times is like going to the library - and finding out it costs to check out a book. Here's Salmon's concluding graphs:
One of the paradoxes of news media is that most of the time, the more you’re paying to use it, the harder it is to navigate. Sites like HuffPo make navigation effortless, while it can take weeks or months to learn how to properly use a Bloomberg or Westlaw terminal. Once the NYT implements its paywall, it’s locking itself into that broken system: it will be providing an expensive service to a self-selecting rich elite who are willing to put in the time to learn how to use it. Meanwhile, most Americans will happily get their news from friendlier and much more approachable free services like HuffPo.

Rather than learning from or trying to emulate HuffPo’s hugely valuable editorial technology, then, the NYT is sticking its head in the sand and retreating to a defensive stance of trying to make as much money as possible from its core loyal readers. There’s no growth in such a strategy. Indeed, the opposite is true: the NYT is making it both hard and expensive to become a core loyal reader. Meanwhile, the open web will become ever more accessible and social, with friends pointing friends to news in a site-agnostic manner. The NYT is distancing itself from that conversation, standing proud and aloof. It’s a strategy which is doomed to fail.

Sep 23, 2010

Four today

1. eMeg Whitman, Republican candidate for California governor, is the 332nd richest person in the world and only one of 34 women to make the Forbes 400. Gawker

2. Getting a handle on the SEO slave-drivers in the newsroom. Nieman Journalism Lab

3. National Journal continues to beef up, hiring Patricia Wilson from Reuters as the deputy editor-in-chief. The news magazine was criticized for being too male dominated in its new hires. Poynter

4. Spot.us, the fund-raising news site, has a 10-month gig for a reporter/editor to cover "overlooked, quality-of-life issues across Los Angeles." Journalism Jobs (via LA Observed)

Aug 25, 2010

Perception is reality, SEO style

Search engines are like public restrooms. They're only as safe and sanitary as the last people who used them.

For example, the "mosque at Ground Zero" became the most common way to search for information about a controversial Islamic center proposed two blocks from Ground Zero. It was neither a mosque nor at Ground Zero, but search engine optimization doesn't care about accuracy and so the search results reflect the most common perception. This perception is then reflexively reinforced because the search engine points anyone looking for more information to links with the "mosque at Ground Zero" phrase. And anyone wanting to get hits has to use some form of the phrase to get noticed.

There is no search engine janitor.

Poynter has more about this here.