Feb 9, 2011

SEO vs. the paywall

Farhad Manjoo at Slate wonders if the AOL-Huffington Post deal could falter as SEO loses its mojo inside Google's search algorithms. HuffPo can attribute much of its success to cutting down big stories into digestable sizes and then search engine optimizing the hell out of them. To explain how it works, Manjoo offered the following summary of the AOL deal to buy HuffPo:
Before I go on, let me stop and say a couple of more important things: Aol, Aol Acquires Huffington Post, Aol Buys Huffington Post, Aol Buys Huffpo, Aol Huffington Post, Huffington Post, Huffington Post Aol, Huffington Post Aol Merger, Huffington Post Media Group, Huffington Post Sold, Huffpo Aol, Huffpost Aol, Media News.
 Meantime, Felix Salmon says AOL-HuffPo will eventually beat the New York Times and compares the former site to walking through Times Square while the New York Times is like going to the library - and finding out it costs to check out a book. Here's Salmon's concluding graphs:
One of the paradoxes of news media is that most of the time, the more you’re paying to use it, the harder it is to navigate. Sites like HuffPo make navigation effortless, while it can take weeks or months to learn how to properly use a Bloomberg or Westlaw terminal. Once the NYT implements its paywall, it’s locking itself into that broken system: it will be providing an expensive service to a self-selecting rich elite who are willing to put in the time to learn how to use it. Meanwhile, most Americans will happily get their news from friendlier and much more approachable free services like HuffPo.

Rather than learning from or trying to emulate HuffPo’s hugely valuable editorial technology, then, the NYT is sticking its head in the sand and retreating to a defensive stance of trying to make as much money as possible from its core loyal readers. There’s no growth in such a strategy. Indeed, the opposite is true: the NYT is making it both hard and expensive to become a core loyal reader. Meanwhile, the open web will become ever more accessible and social, with friends pointing friends to news in a site-agnostic manner. The NYT is distancing itself from that conversation, standing proud and aloof. It’s a strategy which is doomed to fail.

6 comments:

Calvin Brock said...

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. local seo services

harry said...

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own BlogEngine blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a fine example of it. Visit Website

Bilto Barber said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jerry Jafson said...

its really fantastic blog . its realy informational and a such a good job. i love this check here

Robert Thomson said...

Should there be another persuasive post you can share next time, I’ll be surely waiting for it. seo hosting

Anderson Chinao said...

Should there be another persu asive post you can share next time, I’ll be surely waiting for it. SEO Hosting