Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
decisive thoughts for precise living
Blog Roll
- "To The Point"
- "Which Way, LA?"
- Buzz Bands
- City Maven
- Crooks and Liars
- Democracy in America
- Eastsider LA
- Environmental Health News
- fishbowlLA
- FiveThirtyEight
- Frontal Cortex
- Gannett Blog
- I Don't Like You In That Way
- LA Metblogs
- LA Observed
- LA Times Pressmens' blog
- Marc Cooper
- McGuire on Media
- Media Mob
- Media Nation
- Muck Rack
- Newsonomics
- Newspaper Death Watch
- Nieman Journalism Lab
- On The Media
- Opinionator
- Outposts
- Pandemonium
- Paper Cuts
- Paul Oberjuerge
- Political Wire
- Prop Zero
- Recovering Journalist
- Reflections of a Newsosaur
- Reporter in Exile
- Robert Rector
- Romenesko
- Ron Kaye LA
- Rough & Tumble
- Scott Martelle
- Talking Points Memo
- Tehran Bureau
- The City Maven
- Unclaimed Territory
- Wilshire & Washington
- Witness L.A.
- Zoom
Posts
2 comments:
The Times will come to regret that decision.
As a journalist AND a holder of CCW permits in two states, I am sickened that a newspaper would publish the names of those who hold permits. Disgusting. By and large, anyone who carries concealed has had to pass a number of background checks and must have a squeaky clean record. One of the questions on the application is (paraphrasing to best of my recollection) "Do you have any history of mental illness, or are you taking medications for the treatment of depression or any other mental illness." The whackjob mentioned in the story LIED on his application. So now the other 99.99% of us get to pay for it. Niiiiiice.
Post a Comment